Comments on: Judge Stan Strickland’s Background

By: thejbmission

thejbmission — Mon, 19 Apr 2010 22:14:05 +0000

Hello everyone,
I hope its okay to post here. I wanted to say that I don’t think Jerimiah Lyons is related to Andrea Lyon. I did a quick google check. It seems he’s from New York and comes from an affluent family of lawyers. There was another Jerimiah Lyons who passed away in the 60s. He was a highly respected attorney as far as I can tell.
Everyone thinks I’m dumb because I “somewhat” believed the lunch story. I automatically think the best of people unless I know different, which I did not. I’m relatively new to MD’s site. I have no negative pass experiences so I really didn’t know what to make of it. What’s odd is that he posted it on Nov 30, 2009 article. That’s where I had left my last post. I didn’t see it anywhere else, so I didn’t know what to think. It just seemed hinky..lol @ this point it doesn’t matter.
I’m in complete agreement with most here as to Judge Strickland. After reading all of past credentials, I think my first impression was right. I thought he was perfect for this case and he is stellar. Whatever he did, I feel it was an innocent mistake. But a big mistake, especially considering the magnitude of this case. I hope all works out well for him and he continues his brilliant career as a judge in Orlando.

By: Just Passing By

Just Passing By — Mon, 19 Apr 2010 21:34:27 +0000

Can some smart person give us a rundown on Judge Belvin Perry?

By: Linda From New York

Linda From New York — Mon, 19 Apr 2010 16:33:05 +0000

Kleat, or anyone, how much influence do you think Cindy (or George) have on what goes on with the defense? After all THEY are no paying for her defense. I think their agenda goes way beyond defending their “innocent” client.

By: PAMELA

PAMELA — Mon, 19 Apr 2010 13:34:31 +0000

I know I’m late to the ball, figures that Friday is the day I would pick to have a spinal tap procedure.
Anyhow, I’m so sorry Dave’s been added to the Defense’s “BUMBLES LIST” of people to throw under the bus to “deflect deflect deflect.”
Anyone following this case, and the lawyers’ who have been gracious enough to comment, know that not only is Judge Strickland a very fair impartial judge. But that he has bent over backwards, allowing Baez all his ridiculous antics, misspelled and incorrectly factual motions to give Casey Anthony the highest of impartiallity (SP?) because of the notoriaty of the case and the DP in place. I and lawyer’s have baffled at the baffoon antics of the defense and are amazed at Strickland’s tolerance, in an effort, IMHO, to give Casey the fairest trial, despite her choice of counsel.
I guess if you blog on cases, you may have some idea that it might come back to you. I’m sorry they blindsided Dave, something I don’t think he deserves. But from the moment Dave wrote that Judge Strickland had asked to speak to him, I’ve wondered when it would become a “tactic”. That is their MO. My question would be, this happened how long ago, 7-8 months or more??? Why bring it up now????
And everyone is totally right on, they have not only shot themselves in the foot, but now have the kill “gut”shot, they will slowly and surely bleed out, to death. I see the hand of the “Princess” on this, I see her saying “I don’t like that Judge, he won’t just drop my case like I told him to do, off with his head”. This move, again IMHO, will be the biggest tip of their hand, if Judge Strickland recuses, and I almost hope he does, so the defense will get one of our city’s nastier hangin Judges’, and people in Central Florida know who those Judges’ are.
When Casey drew Judge Strickland’s court, my first thought was “well, at least she’s got a Judge who will be fair, and competant, and consider the legalities of the very difficult Death Penality cases legal wranglings.”
She really is a “stupid spiteful bitch.” IMHO (ok I added the stupid)

By: Kleat

Kleat — Mon, 19 Apr 2010 05:23:17 +0000

Gracie, Rodriguez, not Garcia– judge in civil trial.

By: PotatoHead

PotatoHead — Mon, 19 Apr 2010 03:15:05 +0000

Kleat said: { Apr 18, 2010 – 09:04:53 }
I believe desire to seal the DC interview may be part of this agenda. Not sure by any means, but it certainly has crossed my mind.

gracie34 said: { Apr 18, 2010 – 10:04:37 }
Yes, the civil case is in June. I think Judge Garcia is still hearing it, isn’t he?

By: gracie34

gracie34 — Mon, 19 Apr 2010 03:07:37 +0000

» PotatoHead said: { Apr 18, 2010 – 09:04:47 }

Anybody wondering like me where DC’s investigative interview is in all of this? Why not shoot for the moon and see if another Jurist will call it ‘work product’ after all?

Nothing like a well-timed Hail Mary play.
********************************************

Good point, and isn’t the civil trial coming in June? Different Judge but ?

By: T2M

T2M — Mon, 19 Apr 2010 02:56:48 +0000

» Kleat said: { Apr 18, 2010 – 09:04:07 }

Thank You Kleat, I didn’t know a judge was recently removed.

By: Kleat

Kleat — Mon, 19 Apr 2010 02:54:53 +0000

PotatoHead, maybe in the next doc dump, but maybe that will continue to be fought as to it being sealed and fought in it’s place in the evidence at court.

By: Kleat

Kleat — Mon, 19 Apr 2010 02:53:41 +0000

You know, this move/rant on Judge Strickland, if not critical to Casey’s defense, could well be Cindy’s push to get this done for her own reasons. If Hornsby is right and they will be sorry one day, could this move be to satisfy Casey and her mother?

I suppose we will see once motions are refiled to be reviewed, what the review says about Stricklands decisions.

Ms. Linda K-B sleeps with a man who has commented in an anti-Casey sense on some of the early mega-media shows about forensics related issues about Caylee’s murder and he said it’s all ok because they sleep with a Chinese Wall between them on this issue.

What makes this different?