<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Defense&#8217;s claim of missing Discovery</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thehinkymeter.com/2010/01/28/the-defenses-claim-of-missing-discovery/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thehinkymeter.com/2010/01/28/the-defenses-claim-of-missing-discovery/</link>
	<description>...because something&#039;s just not right.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 15:01:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: WSH</title>
		<link>http://www.thehinkymeter.com/2010/01/28/the-defenses-claim-of-missing-discovery/#comment-8707</link>
		<dc:creator>WSH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 00:53:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thehinkymeter.com/?p=1595#comment-8707</guid>
		<description>This is an interesting theory on &quot;Casey Case Prosecutors Want To Withhold Info&quot;, I would love Silver&#039;s take on it:


http://blinkoncrime.com/2010/01/25/cayleecasey-anthony-case-plea-sans-adjudication-in-court-today/comment-page-10/#comment-1541957
RJ says:
February 3, 2010 at 8:38 pm
I wonder if the State has “learned” something from Dominic Casey? Something that neither DC or the State want to divulge to the defense at this time. Something that might result in charges happening in the future?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an interesting theory on &#8220;Casey Case Prosecutors Want To Withhold Info&#8221;, I would love Silver&#8217;s take on it:</p>
<p><a href="http://blinkoncrime.com/2010/01/25/cayleecasey-anthony-case-plea-sans-adjudication-in-court-today/comment-page-10/#comment-1541957" rel="nofollow">http://blinkoncrime.com/2010/01/25/cayleecasey-anthony-case-plea-sans-adjudication-in-court-today/comment-page-10/#comment-1541957</a><br />
RJ says:<br />
February 3, 2010 at 8:38 pm<br />
I wonder if the State has “learned” something from Dominic Casey? Something that neither DC or the State want to divulge to the defense at this time. Something that might result in charges happening in the future?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WSH</title>
		<link>http://www.thehinkymeter.com/2010/01/28/the-defenses-claim-of-missing-discovery/#comment-8685</link>
		<dc:creator>WSH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 23:19:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thehinkymeter.com/?p=1595#comment-8685</guid>
		<description>Val, is this a good place for this news article?

Casey Case Prosecutors Want To Withhold Info
http://www.wftv.com/news/22425689/detail.html
Posted: 5:47 pm EST February 3, 2010Updated: 5:59 pm EST February 3, 2010
Comment On This Story ››
ORANGE COUNTY, Fla. -- In the case against Casey Anthony Wednesday, prosecutors revealed they want to meet with Judge Stan Strickland privately to get his permission to hold back information from the defense.

Repeatedly, the defense has asked for more information from federal investigators before moving their case forward, but it&#039;s unclear whether that&#039;s the evidence at issue.

Prosecutors also argued that, if the defense questions every material witness under oath, Casey&#039;s trial won&#039;t start before May of 2011.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Val, is this a good place for this news article?</p>
<p>Casey Case Prosecutors Want To Withhold Info<br />
<a href="http://www.wftv.com/news/22425689/detail.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.wftv.com/news/22425689/detail.html</a><br />
Posted: 5:47 pm EST February 3, 2010Updated: 5:59 pm EST February 3, 2010<br />
Comment On This Story ››<br />
ORANGE COUNTY, Fla. &#8212; In the case against Casey Anthony Wednesday, prosecutors revealed they want to meet with Judge Stan Strickland privately to get his permission to hold back information from the defense.</p>
<p>Repeatedly, the defense has asked for more information from federal investigators before moving their case forward, but it&#8217;s unclear whether that&#8217;s the evidence at issue.</p>
<p>Prosecutors also argued that, if the defense questions every material witness under oath, Casey&#8217;s trial won&#8217;t start before May of 2011.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kari</title>
		<link>http://www.thehinkymeter.com/2010/01/28/the-defenses-claim-of-missing-discovery/#comment-8497</link>
		<dc:creator>kari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 12:45:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thehinkymeter.com/?p=1595#comment-8497</guid>
		<description>will the picture of the toy horse that was in the bag with Caylee ever be shown as evidence? never hear about that - obviously no fingerprints, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>will the picture of the toy horse that was in the bag with Caylee ever be shown as evidence? never hear about that &#8211; obviously no fingerprints, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lynn</title>
		<link>http://www.thehinkymeter.com/2010/01/28/the-defenses-claim-of-missing-discovery/#comment-8474</link>
		<dc:creator>Lynn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 00:10:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thehinkymeter.com/?p=1595#comment-8474</guid>
		<description>Unidentified hair on the duct tape. I don&#039;t see what the fuss is all about. That stuff is sticky. I could go into my garage right now and find dog hair, horse hair and most likely a hair from someone in my family. I have bought duct tape that was not wrapped in the store and I am sure some strangers hair could get stuck to it. I lose at least 10 hairs everytime I blow dry my hair. I spend extra time every morning cleaning the hairs up in the bathroom. Is this the reason the defense came up with a stranger did it theory?  They better not pick me as juror, I would eliminate that senario in a hot second. Geez.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unidentified hair on the duct tape. I don&#8217;t see what the fuss is all about. That stuff is sticky. I could go into my garage right now and find dog hair, horse hair and most likely a hair from someone in my family. I have bought duct tape that was not wrapped in the store and I am sure some strangers hair could get stuck to it. I lose at least 10 hairs everytime I blow dry my hair. I spend extra time every morning cleaning the hairs up in the bathroom. Is this the reason the defense came up with a stranger did it theory?  They better not pick me as juror, I would eliminate that senario in a hot second. Geez.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WSH</title>
		<link>http://www.thehinkymeter.com/2010/01/28/the-defenses-claim-of-missing-discovery/#comment-8471</link>
		<dc:creator>WSH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 23:24:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thehinkymeter.com/?p=1595#comment-8471</guid>
		<description>» Lizanyx said: { Feb 2, 2010 - 04:02:21 } 

Thank you for the legwork. That certainly makes a difference, if true.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>» Lizanyx said: { Feb 2, 2010 &#8211; 04:02:21 } </p>
<p>Thank you for the legwork. That certainly makes a difference, if true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lizanyx</title>
		<link>http://www.thehinkymeter.com/2010/01/28/the-defenses-claim-of-missing-discovery/#comment-8470</link>
		<dc:creator>Lizanyx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 22:55:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thehinkymeter.com/?p=1595#comment-8470</guid>
		<description>Sorry this is so behind the postings, but I was doing some catch up reading and wanted to comment...
The hairs found by Dr Lee were not loose in the trunk. The hairs were collected from the trash which was removed from the car and recovered from the dumpster. If you go back and read the discovery pertaining to Dr Lee&#039;s findings you will see the hairs were recovered from soda cans and napkins. I believe these hairs came from Anthony Lazarro&#039;s apartment and belong to the residents of the apartment. When LE was first processing the car they were concentrating on finding evidence to indicate wether Caylee was dead or truly missing. Their main focus was finding additional hair with death banding. I feel Dr Lee&#039;s &quot;hairs&quot; are just another red herring thrown out by the defense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry this is so behind the postings, but I was doing some catch up reading and wanted to comment&#8230;<br />
The hairs found by Dr Lee were not loose in the trunk. The hairs were collected from the trash which was removed from the car and recovered from the dumpster. If you go back and read the discovery pertaining to Dr Lee&#8217;s findings you will see the hairs were recovered from soda cans and napkins. I believe these hairs came from Anthony Lazarro&#8217;s apartment and belong to the residents of the apartment. When LE was first processing the car they were concentrating on finding evidence to indicate wether Caylee was dead or truly missing. Their main focus was finding additional hair with death banding. I feel Dr Lee&#8217;s &#8220;hairs&#8221; are just another red herring thrown out by the defense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kari</title>
		<link>http://www.thehinkymeter.com/2010/01/28/the-defenses-claim-of-missing-discovery/#comment-8468</link>
		<dc:creator>kari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 20:51:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thehinkymeter.com/?p=1595#comment-8468</guid>
		<description>One more thing..... seems like the Big Trouble shirt came from Caylee&#039;s overnight bag. One that Casey maybe carried in her car so when she spent the night somewhere, she had clothes.... like telling Cindy she was staying overnight at the Nanny&#039;s but she stayed at Ricardo&#039;s. Was wondering if she used clothing that Caylee was outgrowing, like shirt and shorts, for the stay in the car overnight clothes. Maybe the Teddy bear pull up  came from an old package...not at the Anthony&#039;s house anymore because there were only a few left and the went into the take along overnight bag. 

I also believe the hair tested that came back positive for decomp was described the same way as hair on napkins-- that doc is so long it is hard for me to tell u exactly where everything is</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One more thing&#8230;.. seems like the Big Trouble shirt came from Caylee&#8217;s overnight bag. One that Casey maybe carried in her car so when she spent the night somewhere, she had clothes&#8230;. like telling Cindy she was staying overnight at the Nanny&#8217;s but she stayed at Ricardo&#8217;s. Was wondering if she used clothing that Caylee was outgrowing, like shirt and shorts, for the stay in the car overnight clothes. Maybe the Teddy bear pull up  came from an old package&#8230;not at the Anthony&#8217;s house anymore because there were only a few left and the went into the take along overnight bag. </p>
<p>I also believe the hair tested that came back positive for decomp was described the same way as hair on napkins&#8211; that doc is so long it is hard for me to tell u exactly where everything is</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kari</title>
		<link>http://www.thehinkymeter.com/2010/01/28/the-defenses-claim-of-missing-discovery/#comment-8463</link>
		<dc:creator>kari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 18:18:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thehinkymeter.com/?p=1595#comment-8463</guid>
		<description>I have a question about the napkins. I was looking at a letter on Page 9602 Karen Cowan who stated: The reason for the question and emphasis in that these hairs were found in what the entomologist/body farm is calling “death or grave wax.”
http://www.wftv.com/pdf/21252257/detail.html
Caucasian light/med brown . This type of hair was throughout the evidence where her body was found (laundry bag, blanket, ect.) Could this be Caylee’s hair? Does this help prove that the grave wax was due to her body being in the trunk?

Little Mermaid pull ups P.9675 from house and pics of them are on P.9786 The evidence shows that the pull ups that were found at the scene had teddy bears ballooning and parachuting P. 10223 Could this be a swim diaper and not a pull up? They never found that exact match. Not sure if they ever took any swim diapers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a question about the napkins. I was looking at a letter on Page 9602 Karen Cowan who stated: The reason for the question and emphasis in that these hairs were found in what the entomologist/body farm is calling “death or grave wax.”<br />
<a href="http://www.wftv.com/pdf/21252257/detail.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.wftv.com/pdf/21252257/detail.html</a><br />
Caucasian light/med brown . This type of hair was throughout the evidence where her body was found (laundry bag, blanket, ect.) Could this be Caylee’s hair? Does this help prove that the grave wax was due to her body being in the trunk?</p>
<p>Little Mermaid pull ups P.9675 from house and pics of them are on P.9786 The evidence shows that the pull ups that were found at the scene had teddy bears ballooning and parachuting P. 10223 Could this be a swim diaper and not a pull up? They never found that exact match. Not sure if they ever took any swim diapers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JMJ</title>
		<link>http://www.thehinkymeter.com/2010/01/28/the-defenses-claim-of-missing-discovery/#comment-8407</link>
		<dc:creator>JMJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 19:26:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thehinkymeter.com/?p=1595#comment-8407</guid>
		<description>Maura,
Along with everyone else here, I really thank you for your posts. I looked back up and saw that you answered my question before I even posted.
I don&#039;t know what you do for your career but you have amazing recall. Do you keep it filed in a particular way? You also seem to find more  information from the documents than I am able to, and can present it in a clear and understandable way. 
I should just stop posting and read. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maura,<br />
Along with everyone else here, I really thank you for your posts. I looked back up and saw that you answered my question before I even posted.<br />
I don&#8217;t know what you do for your career but you have amazing recall. Do you keep it filed in a particular way? You also seem to find more  information from the documents than I am able to, and can present it in a clear and understandable way.<br />
I should just stop posting and read. :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maura</title>
		<link>http://www.thehinkymeter.com/2010/01/28/the-defenses-claim-of-missing-discovery/#comment-8401</link>
		<dc:creator>Maura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 17:23:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thehinkymeter.com/?p=1595#comment-8401</guid>
		<description>Curiousmom,

Here&#039;s a link to some information about opening statements.  It&#039;s from the website of a Florida criminal defense lawyer:

http://criminaldefense.homestead.com/Opening.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Curiousmom,</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a link to some information about opening statements.  It&#8217;s from the website of a Florida criminal defense lawyer:</p>
<p><a href="http://criminaldefense.homestead.com/Opening.html" rel="nofollow">http://criminaldefense.homestead.com/Opening.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

